If Youth Changed Anything, They’d Abolish It

So far, the ConDems are doing a fine job of that thanks to targeting its most regressive cutbacks on persons 16 to 35 years of age.

I don’t claim to be an anthropologist nor a social historian. Perhaps you could call this a rant. Strictly speaking it is, but it’s no typical shouty one. Rather a muted one about the way Britain’s young people are being treated. Which is, at this very moment, very badly.

Once upon a time, not so long ago (well, 35 years ago to be exact), you could reach the age of 25 as a debt free citizen with a secure job. You could better yourself at university, a Further Education college or polytechnic, free of debt. In most cases free of charge. With a grant. Plus you could have claimed Unemployment Benefit if you studied as a full time undergraduate. Or as a college student from the age of 16 onwards. By 25 years of age, you could have got a mortgage and – if you were lucky – paid it off by the 1990s. If not, there was ample Council Housing, even if some of the estates were inhospitable. Job security was higher thanks to a strong labour movement. We also had Wages Councils and a Prices and Incomes Board which made for stable price controls on essentials like bread and milk.

By 2014, things have changed, certainly not for the better. Right To Buy and today’s Help To Buy scheme has made independence a pipe dream for a number of working class under 25s. The former helped to reduce and privatise municipal housing stock. The latter, is helping more monied people to reinforce their hold on the housing market, creating a bubble thus pricing out first time buyers. Council housing has largely been supplanted by Arms Length Management Organisations. The ‘Bedroom Tax’ and changes to the Social Security system has made having a roof over your head much harder.

Today, further and higher education warrants financial cost in the form of five-figure Student Loan debts. Social mobility has become a luxury for anyone earning less than £20k a year. Few 25 year olds are lucky enough to earn £20,000 p.a., unless they get in to debt with a similar amount or more after three to four years as an undergraduate. Where are the jobs? There’s a fair number of apprenticeships around, but how many are genuine instead of ways around evading National Minimum Wage legislation? If you visit the Universal Job Match website, you will see a fair number of part time positions, but a lot – and I mean a lot – of Catalogue Distributor positions. Betterware, Kleeneze, that sort of stuff – also known as Multi-Level Marketing – self employed, no guarantee of regular weekly or monthly income either.

Plus, it is also proposed that persons under the age of 25 would be sent on a Mandatory Work Activity programme if they ‘failed’ on The Work Programme. In other words, more cheap labour for multinationals, or community groups. The nature of voluntary work itself is having its well poisoned. More than anything, we all want a fair day’s work for a fair day’s pay, but our fellows in Westminster is reviving the workhouse, albeit in the comfort of our home. Or cardboard box.

And you wonder why finding a place of their own is tougher now compared with 1979. Today’s wages aren’t enough for a deposit, zero hours equals zero mortgage or any other form of consumer credit. If you are sixteen years of age, you cannot claim Social Security benefits till eighteen years of age. Woe betide any teen with limited financial means wishing to leave home at 16 or 17. Given recent policy changes, anyone under the age of 35.

The Conservatives are aiming to disenfranchise people under the age of 35 much more. Persons under 35 years of age cannot claim the full rate of Housing Benefit; they can only claim a Shared Room Rate, which has been effective since 2010. Plus they are also subject to the Bedroom Tax, even more perverse if aged 18 to 24 on lower rates of Social Security benefits and National Minimum Wage rates.

By May 2015, if they are returned to power, worse will come as half of the proposed £25billion cutbacks will affect the Department of Work and Pensions. Under 25s could be unable to claim Social Security benefits. Homelessness will mushroom, not only by 2015, but possibly by 2015 on the 24 December 2014 or sooner. Unscrupulous private landlords are increasingly putting up the ‘No DSS’ signs and evicting incumbent claimants, whether they’ve had a good credit history or not.

Instead of nurturing new younger talent into our workplaces, government policy favours later retirement ages – much to the chagrin of older people in strenuous jobs. Young people are poorly represented in the media as ‘lacking morals’, ‘workshy’, ‘feral’ and ‘lazy’. The oldest political trick in the world [divide and rule] is the back story behind the ‘people are living longer’ lie. A even bigger one in deprived parts of Britain like Middlesbrough, Manchester and Hackney rather than Harrogate, Cheadle and Kensington. Why are people in Manchester, Middlesbrough and Hackney living shorter lives than in Harrogate, Cheadle and Kensington? Poverty and high unemployment.

In addition to above, proposed changes will deny some people under 35 years of age the right to their own home, independence and secure employment. Some will be forced to stay at home with parents they have little or no time for, thus increasing dependency owing to financial shortfall.

Which is why I’ve wondered why 35 is now the age of full adulthood.

From 16, you can procreate and shoot people. At 18, buy cigarettes, vote, drink alcohol purchased from an off-licence or a public house, and claim Social Security benefits – albeit at a reduced rate. By 25, you are entitled to the full rates of most Social Security benefits and the National Minimum Wage, though not the full rate of Housing Benefit (Shared Room Rate only).

By 35, you can claim the full rate of Housing Benefit as well as other Social Security benefits and the National Minimum Wage. There’s every chance you may be a homeowner, have a steady job, children of your own and have enough money to improve your immediate surroundings.

At one time, you could have had all the above detailed in the last paragraph, at the age of 25. Or 18 even. There was no such thing as Workfare, only full employment; you didn’t need to drive to your nearest Post Office; drinking alcohol didn’t mark you out as a ‘binge drinker’ as seen on such ‘winsome’ programmes like Bouncers, Booze Britain or any other anti-drinking lobby inspired crapumentaries. Claiming Social Security was a necessity rather than an evil on hard times, thanks to your own National Insurance Contributions, and there was no shame. No one in the street, mass media or internet labelling you as a ‘scrounger’, even if your National Insurance contributions funded your JSA as well as State Pension.

The post-1979 mindset has infantilised our view of vulnerable persons and young people wishing to better themselves. In spite of opposition to the ConDems’ recent changes, there is a sizeable groundswell of opinion who favour harder and faster cuts.

If we wish to improve prospects among 16 to 35 year olds, we need to get out of the post-1979 mindset. What made and makes Britain a pleasant enough place to reside is our sense of fair play and justice. The absolute high water mark of this was the Post-Second World War Consensus from 1945 to 1979. A seminal moment which ushered in full employment, the foundation of the National Health Service, a supportive Welfare State, and public ownership of our railways, coal, steel, buses, oil, gas, water and electricity. One where higher education was free and publicly funded.

In 2014, it is ‘Never Again, Again’. Time to return to the values of Clement Attlee rather than Margaret Thatcher. There’s only seventeen months to go, not merely a lifetime. Most importantly, people aged 16 to 35 years old need a real future. Otherwise they will leave us, and the rest of the UK without any fresh thinking. Right now, some of us are happy to get Bobby Charlton playing another 90 minutes instead of finding and nurturing a future Wayne Rooney. (I don’t care where the latter comes from either, be it Bucharest or Buckinghamshire).

S.V., 06 January 2014.

Advertisements

2 thoughts on “If Youth Changed Anything, They’d Abolish It

Add yours

  1. Totally agree Stuart and you think how I do. One other annoyance I now find is the upsurge of the 0 hour contract! Are you employed or are you not? What use is a 4 hour a week job to a 22 year old graduate at £6.69 an hour who soon will not be entitled to housing benefit to help them start life independently. Why should a generation be confined to being cramped into living with their parents. Why should a generation have to rely on being proped up financially by their parents or grandparents because they can’t afford the rent even though they work full time, sometimes 2 even 3 jobs.
    This disaster of a Govt don’t give a toss about the youth of this nation. They are too busy making their rich buddies richer, more bothered about sending funds abroad to countries that have space programs and dismantling the one thing I hold dear to me the National Health Service.
    Without it I wouldn’t have lived to write this and I work long hours, low pay and do my up most as an employee in the very system that saved me but is now a system that is on the brink of a disaster because of BILLIONS being wasted by needless reorganizations and these savage cuts.
    They keep saying the health service budget hasn’t been cut. That is a kind of truth, it hasn’t, but answer me this. Does a loaf of bread cost the same as it did in 2008? That is the issue with the NHS budget. It’s not going as far as it once did. Staff are having pay cuts, regraded or made redundant and swathes of services have been handed over to the private sector. ARRIVA with the NWAS PTS in Greater Manchester as an example.
    I despise this Govt as much as I despised THAT WOMAN and her systematic destruction of the proud North, Wales and Scotland.
    I don’t know if Labour could do any better but could they do any worse?

    Like

    1. Hi Trystan,

      I have noticed the rise of the Zero Hour Contract myself; such positions have steadily risen since 2008, the height of the global financial downturn. Previously, casual contracts were a popular option, though employees were free to work for other companies or public sector bodies (unlike some of the very worst Zero Hour Contracts).

      If prospects for students continue to worsen, thanks to precarious employment and punitive sanctions for meagre Social Security payments, how on earth will they pay back their student loans? There will come a time where we need to consider a clear student debt policy after a given period. Though costly to the taxpayer, it could almost be a refund. It might be cheaper to scrap tuition fees altogether and publicly fund universities from higher rates of Income Tax on the super rich.

      To be brutally honest, the Conservative-led Coalition ‘Government’ doesn’t give a stuff about anyone who earns less than £1m a year! Even more so if you happen to be an homosexual northerner on the autism spectrum living in social housing, under the age of 25.

      The Tories claim to be spending more on the NHS, but you are right, it is in bureaucracy and pointless reorganisations as per the 2012 Health and Social Care Bill (which I personally call The NHS Destruction Bill). Plus it is squeezing wages as you said meaning fewer nurses, less patient care. That’s before I mention the amount of private beds hospitals are able to allocate (up to 49% of all beds) and February 2012 seeing credit ratings issued to all NHS hospitals!

      With the shift of Housing Benefit and Social Fund payments to local authorities, that squeezes their squeezed resources. Ultimately, that could lead to greater financial turmoil and their endgame of a Britain free from the Public Sector. Goodbye Welfare State, Hello Privatised Police State.

      That woman, well I am starting to despise the present government even more than M.T. – and that is saying something!

      At present, Labour, though far from perfect is our best choice of getting the ConDems out of 10 Downing Street. That is more down to our antiquated First Past The Post election system which a fair number voted to keep after saying no to a form of Proportional Representation in a recent referendum. UKIP would only accelerate the Tories’ cuts programme even more, and are far less sympathetic to the public sector and minorities, in spite of their libertarian veneer. At least Scotland has a chance of voting themselves out of this neoliberal chaos on the 18 September 2014.

      Bye for now,

      Stuart.

      Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Up ↑

%d bloggers like this: