Unnecessary, Unjust and Divisive

East of the M60’s response to the first Con-Dem Budget

My name’s Stuart Vallantine, I fell off my grandma’s bed and woke up in 1981. Am I mad, exiled in deepest Cheshire, or back in time? Whatever’s happened, it’s like I’ve landed on a different planet where monetarism is king. Now, maybe if I can work out the reason, I might leave home.

Seriously, after listening to today’s budget, I thought I was listening to the 1981 budget by Geoffrey Howe, or his 1979 one which saw VAT nearly double from 8% and 12.5% to 15%. The attack on public sector could easily have come from a Thatcher era budget. So much for the new politics we were promised; what we are receiving is Thatcherism 2.0, thanks to the sale of 7 million Lib Dem votes to David Cameron and Co.

So, what have they inflicted on us?

  • 25% public sector budget cuts over the next four years (7.25% per annum; NHS and international aid excepted);
  • 20% VAT from 03 January 2011 (up from current 17.5% rate);
  • £11 billion worth of cuts by 2014 from the DWP budget: this includes a freeze on Child Benefit and medical assessments for Disability Living Allowance;
  • A freeze on alcohol, tobacco and fuel duties;
  • A change in the lower income tax threshold to the first £7,475;
  • Below inflation public sector pay rises for low paid employees;
  • 2 year pay freeze for public sector employees earning £21k per annum and above;
  • 1 year council tax freeze;
  • The restoration of the earnings link with state pensions;
  • Bank balance sheet levy;
  • The formation of a Green Investment Bank.

In a nutshell, very few carrots and one massive stick. Rather more iron bar than stick and especially so if you live in the North of England where the biggest employers are the public sector.

The public sector spending cuts will have a massive effect on frontline service delivery. Councils may consider privatising back-office services, reducing scope for secure skilled employment. Frontline services could be affected by reduced opening hours, subcontraction to external bodies (outsourcing companies and non-profit organisation) and property sales. Subsidised bus routes may suffer withdrawal.

This will be exacerbated by a 1 year freeze on council tax bills, and pay freezes (or minimal rises for low paid) public sector staff. Low pay may dissuade new starters – assuming public sector bodies are willing to recruit. Staff leaving the public sector may find their position left unfilled indefinitely through ‘natural wastage’.

The public sector pay freeze will have a hugely negative effect on the prosperity of the Tameside area. In Ashton, no amount of new trams would stop the Arcades Shopping Centre having problems with empty units. The fancy coffee shops will be emptier, fewer stalls will be trading on Ashton Market, and the already pressed public sector employees in the local Jobcentres will find themselves collapsing under the weight of high unemployment.

This takes us to VAT, which would also have a causal effect on the service industry. Say goodbye to all these coffee shops. Bid a fond farewell to the market traders struggling with VAT as well as a double whammy with higher stall rates (caused by council tax freezes). Au revoir casual dining establishments and cinemas.

Osborne’s decision to raise VAT to 20% by the 03 January 2011 would see job losses within the service sector. This will be caused by the double whammy of reduced spending power by the few people still in work and price rises. The loss of traditional industries and replacement by the service industries would affect the North of England most, where former coalfields and steel plants have been replaced by retail parks and call centres (which even prior to the budget did not fully replace the lost jobs in the heavy industries).

With the resultant increase in unemployment, spending power will be reduced even further by the downward shift in incomes. Woe betide anybody who dares to have a second child (freezes in Child Benefit), or happens to be on the autism spectrum (existing on Disability Living Allowance), or fits both categories.

Naturally, I expected the proposals to introduce assessments on future DLA claimants to cause controversy. It is also worth noting that assessment by a DWP Approved doctor for Incapacity Benefit has been in use for 15 years. Plans for DLA assessments were considered in the midst of creating James Purnell’s drafting of his Social Security Bill. I fear it may become a bureaucratic nightmare and that the assessment depends on the knowledge of local medical professions. What if your ASD diagnosis was made 15 years ago, whereby sufficient support enabled you to live an independent life? People on the high functioning end of the autism spectrum like myself may find themselves without sufficient support, if the assessor neglects to take into account more subtle problems?

Two welcome measures (the £1,000 increase on the basic rate income tax threshold, and the restoration of the earnings link to state pensions) will be cancelled out by the savage cuts. Though welcome, pensioners will be no better off than prior to the budget as that will be cancelled out by January’s VAT increase. Likewise the low paid part-time workers. Instead of properly taxing the rich, we have opted for a Robin Hood tax in the reverse, due to the amount of VAT paid as a proportion of their earnings.

“I warn you not to be young…”

Being poor and middle aged may be bad, but to be poor and aiming towards university education soon after secondary school will have the most to lose. Not to be content with the abolition of the Future Jobs Fund and Baby Bonds, another announcement went virtually undetected. As well as having trouble finding work to fund their studies (thanks to VAT), the Chancellor plans to privatise the Student Loans Company.

The cost of higher education is already high enough with tuition fees and student loans during a typical 3 to 4 year long BA Honours course. Privatising the Student Loans Company could well see an end to the low public sector borrowing rates. Instead, we could well see commercial interest rates introduced. Higher Education would not only become a preserve of the wealthy, but also to those with an excellent credit rating.


The much vaunted Broken Britain which Cameron harped on about could well be on its way. As well as the City, the other winners of the budget would be criminals as acquisitive crime may increase; the man in the pub selling fake DVDs in the pub could be seen as offering ‘fair competition’. The police officer may take longer to catch the thief; the Trading Standards officer may be laid off.

Our education system would be more polarised by means of free schools, credit card interest rates on student loans and a return to the pre-Harold Wilson era number of university students. There will be longer waits at local bus stops, charges for public services once available freely, and above all, the return of the Lost Dole Age.

Unlike 1979, we have sold off most of the family silver. Instead of forcing the City to pick up the tab for their misdoings, they passed the tab onto us, and Boy! are we going to pay for this big style when we shouldn’t have to. Instead of a prosperous knowledge-based economy resulting in higher tax revenues, we could see wage rates fall ever lower as unemployment rises resulting in reduced tax revenue. Therefore, this would lead us towards a dangerous spiral, where this year’s set of cuts could be a tip of the iceberg.

Spivvery has been legislated. We must do everything to stop this becoming reality. This means protecting our public services, paying public sector employees properly, and treating our young people as assets rather than liabilities.

There was no ‘public interest’ and equality in this year’s budget. Just ideologically inspired cuts which has turned the Con-Dem Coalition into a Thatcherism Tribute Act. The onus was, as was the case under Thatcher, a chance to shrink the public sector.

Unnecessary, unjust and divisive: welcome to Thatcherism 2.0.

Will the last person to leave the country please switch off the lights? I would much rather you do that than return home to your constituency and prepare for Torygeddon.

S.V., 22 June 2010.


4 thoughts on “Unnecessary, Unjust and Divisive

Add yours

  1. Stuart,
    If anything its a massive lesson to us all.
    I like many people were unsure who to vote for before the election. I did consider voting Lib Dem as Nick Clegg seemed like a real honest guy, im only glad i diddn’t vote for him.
    His constant promises through his election campaign that raising VAT would be a ‘ticking timebomb’ rung in favour with allot of people and yet yesterday he sat there and looked rather sheepish when Mr Osborne announced the rise in VAT.

    Its too early to say if this will ‘sink Britain’ but this is one reason why ALL polticians carn’t be trusted. They will say anything when they want your vote, and yet they soon forget once they have won.



  2. Hello again FelixFind,

    Following the events of the last month I can see Clegg being banned from Sheffield city centre indefinitely or losing his Sheffield Hallam seat by 2015. He was by far the best performer on the live televised leaders’ debates, but like the cowboy builder with a promising sales pitch, he failed to do the job properly.

    I had this sneaking feeling that Clegg and Cameron during the debates were hiding a massive skeleton in the cupboard. They failed to come clean on as to where the cuts would, and as to whether or not they would increase VAT. It turns out that VAT and cuts to disability benefits were these skeletons in their cupboard!

    I knew straight away that both members of the Con-Dem Coalition were just as anti-trade union and public sector as their political role models 30 years earlier were. They’ve had a privileged upbringing and have never had the pleasure of queueing outside Scotland Street DHSS office on a cold winter morning for their dole money.

    Bye for now,



  3. Why do I have to pay for the cost of bailing out the bankers?

    As a lowly local government officer I have been told that my pay will be frozen for at least two years, I’ve got to pay 2.5% more VAT, and almost certainly more into my pension fund on top of the 8% of my wages that I do already. With inflation heading towards 5% I make it that my income will be cut by at least 10% over the next two years. Will bankers, Tory newspaper editors, company directors, solicitors and accountants be making the same sacrifice?

    Oh yeah, we’ve been told today to expect at least 10% of us here will have to go in the next twelve months on top of the 200 that wnt last year.


  4. I too think its at best unbelievable and at worst scandalous that we should be bailing out the very people who wrecked our economies. Even worse is the fact that the public sector (whose wages are already below private sector earnings for modest posts in the first place) are picking up the tab.

    I can fully sympathise with you being that most of my friends and family directly and indirectly work within the public sector. For a start, the proposals will put pressure on a Jobcentre network which has already been streamlined by the Gershon spending review prior to Osborne’s budget. Tax revenue would fall due to higher unemployment, leading us to a spiral of deeper cutbacks and further indirect taxation. The extra VAT revenue would be ineffective due to reduced consumer spending.

    In short, there will be no winners apart from the City and the landed gentry. No wonder Mugabe lent his support to the Tories in the run-up to the General Election.



Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

Up ↑

%d bloggers like this: